FreeBSD's Visual Identity: Outdated?
scottl at freebsd.org
Sun Jul 3 00:10:33 GMT 2005
>> If we want to be taken seriously in the commercial world then we
>> need to have the right image.
> Look ma, a strawman!
> The concern you're addressing is the sort of thing distros
> solved in the Linux world. Each typically has their own
> "image," installer, system config style, etc. More importantly
> for the "commercial world," though, they offer support and
> The image alone just isn't the problem. Or a problem at all,
> I'd argue. Let's be honest -- if a ten-year-old made Beastie,
> then a mentally challenged 3-year-old made Tux (and large
> portions of the kernel, but I digress).
> Point being Johann, if the community rejects your work
> for the core project you can still make your own distro
> and release it. Give it a shot!
The distro - vs - core release relationship is one of BSD's greatest
strengths and weaknesses. It's a strength because there is no 'distro
hell' like there is in linux. When you download FreeBSD, you get the
same FreeBSD as everyone else; there is no confusion over how the
config files are layed out, no differences in the base utilities,
everything compiles the same way, etc. That is a huge benefit. But at
the same time, it makes it really hard for people to branch out and
experiment in the same way that a linux distro can. FreeSBIE is a good
example of this happening and working, but it definitely has hurdles.
Variety and competition makes the whole stronger, and at times FreeBSD
seems a bit in-bred. To address this, I'm playing with ideas for
changing the nature of a FreeBSD 'release' a bit to make it easier for
outfits like FreeSBIE to build on top of it. Hopefully I'll have
something to show for this in 6.0.
freebsd-arch at freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-questions