Poor information in ports UPDATING file

Kris Kennaway kris at obsecurity.org
Fri Jan 28 08:48:35 PST 2005

On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 11:01:06AM +0000, Chris Hodgins wrote:

> "20050126:
> AFFECTS: users of x11-wm/xfce4
> AUTHOR: oliver at FreeBSD.org

> Maybe I am just too used to the excellent amount of detail in the 
> UPDATING file usually but this doesn't even offer advice on how to 
> update your plugins.  Every UPDATING file entry I have found useful in 
> the past has always had a command you could use to carry out this update 
> plus whether you should update your port first then update the dependencies.

Talk to the author, then.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20050128/d90b4323/attachment.bin

More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list