ph.schulz at gmx.de
Sun Jan 2 06:53:02 PST 2005
Bill Moran wrote:
> "Victor Foulk" <VFoulk at KEWD.com> wrote:
>>What I really had hoped to find, was more of an experienced
>>networking guru's thumb rule equating the number of safeLAN
>>workstations with the required gateway RAM/Processor; to
>>enable all safeLAN users to experience a minimal network
>>transaction time roughly equivalent to what they would see
>>if plugged directly into a really good hub.
>>Something maybe in the form of:
>>Proc Speed = X*Users+Y
>>RAM = W*Users+Z
I don't think _anybody_ can give such a formula. Especially not whithout
knowing how much and what kind of traffic your users generate. But as
others have said already, good NICs are essential.
> As a general rule of thumb, I won't put FreeBSD on anything smaller
> than a 1Ghz with 128M of RAM and 4G of disk space. While you can
> get away with smaller, that's about the minimum before using the
> box for maintenance purposes becomes a terrible burdon. Try upgrading
> and rebuilding world on a 266!
You can always build world remotely. 1GHz seems to be overkill for a
router. Just think of energy consumption.
More information about the freebsd-questions