portupgrade vs. portmanager

[Michael C. Shultz]

On Saturday 01 January 2005 04:30 am, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> On 28 Dec Michael C. Shultz wrote:
> > Portmanager only addresses that one issue and for the forseeable
> > future that is where all the focus will be, only on correctly
> > updating ports.
>
> Am I to understand correctly that portmanager _always_ updates ALL
> the old ports? A 'pormanager -u sylpheed' is not possible then?

correct, for now. I like the idea of what your suggestion though I 
think, if you mean being able to upgrade on port and its dependencies.

-Mike