Managing bad sectors during install
kris at obsecurity.org
Thu Feb 17 23:39:58 GMT 2005
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 11:09:12PM +0100, P?sztor Rich?rd wrote:
> I think this 8,4 quantum is old enough to not contain so called "spare
> sectors". So 1 bad sector means there is really only 1 bad
> sector. Anyway i still cant understand, why UFS cant cope with bad blocks,
> but 1000 year old FAT, or the newer NTFS
> can easyli get through the problem.
There didn't seem to be a question there.
> The other problem: how should i mount "/" read-only, because i always get
> "busy" error-message?
When you do what, exactly?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20050217/1b7aed27/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-questions