Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC
chad at shire.net
Tue Feb 15 01:58:03 GMT 2005
On Feb 14, 2005, at 6:48 PM, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes:
>
>> That is laughable. MS IE on Windows has one of the worst reputations
>> around for following web standards. Go ask any professional designer.
>
> I did better. I actually ran the W3C conformance tests against MSIE,
> and it passed. At the time, no other browser came close.
>
> Today, MSIE is not the only browser with good conformance, but it is
> still one of the best. Firefox is young and has some security issues
> that worry me, but we shall see. Opera has the disadvantage of not
> being free, and you don't really get much in exchange for paying for it
> that you wouldn't already get with Firefox or MSIE.
>
You can say all you want. Every professional designer I have ever
talked with lamented the poor state of standards conformance of IE for
Windows. And they could document it. MS only has compatibility with
itself, and that is it. And since it is the 800lb gorilla, they think
they can basically do whatever they want.
People I highly respect have done lots of tests of browsers with the
standard and conformance to the W3C standards suites and IE Windows
does not do that well.
Chad
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list