port entry error
m.seaman at infracaninophile.co.uk
Thu Feb 3 01:47:05 PST 2005
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 02:10:28PM -0500, Steven Friedrich wrote:
> After cvsupping, I do a portsdb -Uu, but I get warnings about duplicate
> entries, and today, I got a "Not in due form".
> What's the cure(s)?
> [Updating the portsdb <format:bdb1_btree> in /usr/ports ... - 12325 port
> entriesfound ...../usr/ports/INDEX:518:aureal-kmod-1.3_4.1: 1.3_4.1: Not in
> due form: '<version>[_<revision>][,<epoch>]'.
> For the "form" problem, isn't the last period supposed to be a comma?
> i.e., aureal-kmod-1.3_4.1 should be aureal-kmod-1.3_4,1 ??
Yeah -- that's a mistake in the aureal-kmod port. The fix is to wait
for the maintainer / ports committers to commit a fix to the ports
tree and then cvsup again. In the mean time, you can just ignore the
error message and the rest of the ports tree will work as well as
In detail the problem is this -- quoting from the port Makefile:
PORTREVISION= 4.1 <---- This item should be an integer value
At least, that's according to the latest Porter's Handbook and bsd.port.mk
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 8 Dane Court Manor
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Tilmanstone
Tel: +44 1304 617253 Kent, CT14 0JL UK
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20050203/22fb19c7/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-questions