freebsd-questions-local at be-well.ilk.org
Tue Aug 30 18:26:34 GMT 2005
Robert Fitzpatrick <lists at webtent.net> writes:
> > > Victor referred me to the archives after finding out I have linked
> > > Postfix with a broken GNU getopt(), but I have not been able to come up
> > > with the solution. My current getopt package is gengetopt-2.11, should I
> > > resort to an earlier version and re-compile Postfix?
> > >
> > Look at the definition of GETOPT in src/util/sys_defs.h, this expects the
> > GNU getopt on Linux, and the standard GETOPT on BSD and other systems.
> > Problems happen when you link with a GNU getopt on a non GNU libc (i.e.
> > Linux) system.
> > If you really must link Postfix with libraries that slurp-up GNU getopt,
> > "fix" the definition of GETOPT() in sys/util/sys_defs.h. Perhaps there
> > should be a CCARGS override for this...
> I'll have to say I have no idea what these guys are talking about on the
> Postfix list, it must be some port I've installed that has linked in a
> way they suggest. I have not done anything except install very common
> ports on this FreeBSD mail server with no special linking or compile
> options, etc. All ran smooth until the latest portupgrade of Postfix and
> other related packages - amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, etc. Can someone
> here perhaps suggest how I might track down this problem?
> Aug 29 11:11:10 esmtp postfix/master:
> warning: /usr/local/libexec/postfix/pipe: bad command startup --
> Aug 29 11:11:51 esmtp postfix/master:
> warning: /usr/local/libexec/postfix/local: bad command startup --
Why do you think this is a getopt problem? It looks a problem in a
configuration file. Check "postconf -n".
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
More information about the freebsd-questions