simple router ?
Frank Bonnet
f.bonnet at esiee.fr
Mon Nov 29 23:55:38 PST 2004
Bill Moran wrote:
>
>>There have been quite a lot of threads in the past month regarding the
>>network performance of 5.3 being inferior to 4.10.
>>
>>You might also want to bear in mind that with the 5 series you have
>>the benefit of OpenBSD's pf firewall. Although more information on 4.x
>>and pf is available at the following link.
>>
>>http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf/2004-September/000300.html
>>
>>Personally, if it was me, I'd go with 5.x rather than 4.x, but if you
>>are going to be pushing a lot of data then perhaps search the archives
>>for the last month or two regarding network performance.
>
>
> I'm not sure if this is 100% correct anymore. I seem to remember that
> the performance problems were in 5.3BETA and were fixed prior to the
> release of 5.3-RELEASE.
>
> I'm willing to be corrected if I'm wrong, but I think research of
> reliable sources would be smart.
>
Well ... I forgot to say I need this router for few weeks only it will
be replaced by a cisco box when I will be able to purchase it ,-) So
I think a conservative choice would be the best for me in the light of
advices I got from people of this list.
So I'll build the router on 4.10 base as I really don't need extra
features than routing .
Thanks a lot guys
Frank
--
Cordialement/Regards
Frank Bonnet
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list