FreeBSD filesystem performance in Enterprise
Forrest Aldrich
forrie at forrie.com
Mon Mar 1 14:13:25 PST 2004
Not trying to start a holy war - just looking into hard facts to
support some systems I'm designing. FFS will either work, or it
won't. Black or white.
The type of I/O I'm talking about will be in the 100's of thousands of
email messages (probably more) per day... obviously the underlying OS,
filesystem tuning, hardware are also an issue. I'm simply trying to
gain some insight into other's experience with FFS, etc.
Thanks.
Derrick Ryalls wrote:
>>Curious how FreeBSD ffs performs in Enterprise-level
>>environments (ie:
>>email stores that send 100's of thousands of messages per
>>day) versus
>>other filesystems like XFS (I heard thre's a port going on for
>>FreeBSD..?), ReiserFS, et al. Is there a FAQ that covers
>>some of this
>>and the various tuning issues one might consider (filesystem and
>>kernel). This applies either disk-alone or across a raid array,
>>etc. I'm interested in hearing others experiences (good and bad).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>You are almost starting a holy war :)
>
>I believe hotmail used to be hosted on FreeBSD until it was bought out by
>MS, that should be a decent volume indicator.
>
>I run a very small email list server and it works fine on a p200. I did see
>a noticable jump in speed when I switched the mail service from sendmail to
>qmail, so it is also dependant on what you will run.
>
>
>
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list