FreeBSD weakness.
Muhammad Reza
reza at mra.co.id
Mon Jun 21 01:26:39 PDT 2004
BSD cant do multipath routing behind NAT, just like iproute(8) Linux,
hope Paul Hening Kamp Patch will work...
regards
reza
>> Linux is for people who hate Micro$oft.
>> BSD is for people who love Unix.
>
>
> Under these conditions, I guess that I need to go for Linux...
>
> Seriously, one thing that catches my attention is that I don't see any
> really great differences between the BSD (Any version) and the Linux
> community. In doing some reading, it appears that the people at KDE
> and Gnome, as well as many others, have this same thought. I was
> actually pointed in the FreeBSD direction by a magazine writer whom I
> was communicating with about the future of Linux. We talked by email
> and he thought that FreeBSD had to most promise of a good future. He
> suggested that I should check FreeBSD out.
>
> Understand that learning UNIX is not my end goal. It may happen in the
> process, but being a master of the UNIX system is not my end goal. Nor
> is writing programs my goal. I wrote a ton of programs 20 years ago,
> but I haven't written a single line of code in 10 years. I have no
> wish to work in an IT shop anywhere. My goal is simply to keep some of
> my older computers useful. I care less about which operating system I
> am using as long as it does the job that I want. This business of
> buying new computers every year or two is a Micro$oft idea. It is also
> an idea that needs to be re-thought.
>
> Micro$oft is great about jumping onto new technology with half-baked
> software. When they get close to fixing their software, then they
> abandon it for new technology and more half-baked software expecting
> people to buy the new hardware/software. It's a system that Micro$oft
> can't be beaten at. I simply think that it is time for a change.
>
> (I'm not against new ideas. But I hate keeping up with Mr. Gates.)
>
> Lloyd Hayes
>
> Email: wyoming_antelope at yahoo.com
> URL: http://TalkingStaff.bravehost.com
> E-FAX Number: (208) 248-6590
> Web Journal: http://lloyd_hayes.bravejournal.com/
>
>
>
> Tom McLaughlin wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2004-06-19 at 15:40, Jorn Argelo wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Lloyd Hayes wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> I finally decided that I needed to get more information on FreeBSD.
>>>> I got it up and running, then I did something else and I start
>>>> getting errors again....
>>>>
>>>> So I just ordered 3 books on FreeBSD from Amazon. In most of the
>>>> reviews posted there about the books, people were complaining about
>>>> weak documentation, too much information about things that they
>>>> were not interested in, and errors in the in the books which seems
>>>> to be the most common complaint. In my very short recent history
>>>> with FreeBSD, I've formed the opinion that documenting FreeBSD is
>>>> it's greatest weakness. FreeBSD needs someone who can actually type
>>>> to write a good book for beginners who have never seen UNIX code. A
>>>> book is needed with examples that actually WORK! Examples that are
>>>> explained in plain English. There seems to be very few books on
>>>> FreeBSD around.
>>>>
>>> Beginners who never seen UNIX coude shouldn't start with FreeBSD in
>>> the first place, if you ask me. They should start Mandrake Linux or
>>> SuSe or something of the sorts. FreeBSD isn't made to make an "user
>>> friendly" operating system, as Mandrake Linux is aiming at. You just
>>> have to know some Unix stuff before you even start with FreeBSD.
>>>
>>
>> I would have to disgree having my first *nix experience five years ago
>> with Mandrake and switching to FreeBSD a number of months ago. I
>> switched to FreeBSD because I felt my unix skills were getting rusty.
>> When I started with Mandrake I did most of my system configuration and
>> administration from the command line and I learned a lot of unix in
>> those first few years.
>> Over time with the inclusion of more GUI based tools that became
>> harder. Files seemed to keep moving or configuration was spread across
>> too many files. I believe you end up becomming too dependant on the
>> distribution specific configuration tools with Linux and you don't
>> truely learn the system. For anyone who really wants to learn unix the
>> BSDs are the place to start.
>>
>> Linux is for people who hate Micro$oft.
>> BSD is for people who love Unix.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>>
>>
>>> I have the book on the below link, and I must say it is very very
>>> good. Good examples and clearly elaborated, though it lacks in-depth
>>> information, which might be handy for more advanced users. It's good
>>> for beginners who are comfortable in a Unix or Linux enviroment. Why
>>> don't you give that one a shot?
>>>
>>> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0072224096/104-0798845-8369533?v=glance
>>>
>>>
>>> And what about our own FreeBSD Handbook? Don't tell me that that is
>>> bad, because there is book that can beat it if you ask me.
>>>
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Jorn
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list