NFS performances on 5.1

[Harald Schmalzbauer]

On Sunday 01 February 2004 00:26, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> On Saturday 31 January 2004 19:03, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > On Saturday 31 January 2004 17:11, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> > > Did you read the notes in src/UPDATING saying:
> > > NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 5.x IS SLOW:
> >
> > Could you pleas explain that numbers?
>
> No, because you also failed to mention if you've read that section and
> disabled WITNESS and so on.

Ok, it was another thread where I mentioned that I'm tracking current for a 
long time, but of course I read it, I even can't remember when it was 
defaulted to be excluded. So I have code from today and I use similar generic 
options for today in my kernel.
Btw, I replyed to the wrong posting, I asked Jacques Beigbeder to explain his 
numbers.

And even with WITNESS and INVARIANTS in the kernel it would be poor 
performance since the difference is just about 10-20 percent. (last time I 
checked, which is a while ago)

-Harry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20040201/ce4a73f6/attachment-0001.bin