OS X and FreeBSD: What could be a good setup
Chuck Swiger
cswiger at mac.com
Mon Apr 12 12:14:53 PDT 2004
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
[ ... ]
> I'm looking at using FreeBSD on a server (web, mail, file server) with
> OS X, Windows, and probably Linux clients. I'd like the FreeBSD server
> to handle authentication, but that may be a pipe dream to accomplish
> across platforms easily :-/
LDAP would be the way to go given the platforms you mention, although NIS
would work for everything but Windows and would be much easier to set up.
[ ... ]
> That would leave SMB/CIFS, meaning SAMBA, but I haven't found anyone
> able to tell me if CIFS is secure "over the wire". I seem to recall a
> utility that would sniff network packets and if NFS is used, it can
> capture the files as they're travelling over the network; can this
> happen with CIFS?
Oh, yes: unless you use an encrypted tunnelling protocol like a VPN or an SSH
tunnel, pretty much all filesharing protocols are vulnerable to subnet-local
sniffing. Using strong encryption when using wireless is a fine idea. :-)
SMB/CIFS is a reasonably good choice of filesharing protocol if you're dealing
with Windows or Mac systems using HFS+ due to case-insensitivity. For a
pure-Unix setup, NFS (or NFS+NIS) would be a better choice. Modern Unices
handle SMB about as well as they handle NFS.
--
-Chuck
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list