GPL: implications for FreeBSD-on-hardware for sale?
Paul A. Hoadley
paulh at logicsquad.net
Sat Apr 10 03:26:56 PDT 2004
On Sat, Apr 10, 2004 at 09:46:29AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> There's no problem with selling GPL'd programs for money. As the
> cant goes "Free speech, not free beer".
I guess I'm interpreting Section 1 too restrictively then. I took
"You may charge a fee for the physical act of transferring a copy" to
be fairly limiting on the magnitude of this fee. I guess it's not
> All you have to do to comply with the GPL is make available the
> sources to the software you're using to your customers, or let them
> know how they can retrieve them from a third party. In this case,
> probably just pointing them in the direction of the FreeBSD servers
> would be sufficient.
> If you're dead against redistributing GPL'd stuff, you'll find it
> difficult to produce a completely GPL-free setup: removing things
> like the C compiler and gdb and texinfo is easy enough, but such
> things as readline and the regex libraries are harder to deal with.
I'm not against it. I just want to make sure I get the specifics of
the license exactly right. :-)
Thanks a lot for your input, Matthew.
mailto:paulh at logicsquad.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20040410/d1eeb5a8/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-questions