Website up, then down, then up, etc.

Kent Stewart kstewart at owt.com
Fri Oct 24 20:59:01 PDT 2003


On Friday 24 October 2003 08:36 pm, Charles Howse wrote:
> > Hi Charles,
> >
> > --On Friday, October 24, 2003 08:40:09 PM -0500 Charles Howse
> >
> > <chowse at charter.net> wrote:
> > > Strange....
> > > Looking at the header from your email, you came from:
> >
> > mygirlfriday.info
> >
> > > That resolves to 65.64.145.209
> >
> > The above is the address of my remote mail/DNS server. My
> > static IP that I
> > connected to your port 80 is reflected at 65.41.216.204
> >
> > > I see no record of that in /var/log/httpd-access.log.
> > > Could you please confirm the IP address, and convert the time you
> > > connected to UTC?
> >
> > I do not remember what time it was, but it will be in your
> > logs. If not, I
> > will log on again.
> >
> > Both of your questions were available in the email headers
> > from the email
> > originally sent to you. Both of my IP addresses were in the
> > headers, as
> > well as the time.
>
> Thanks for that clarification.
> I do indeed see you in the logfile at 19:31.
> Now I'm getting spooked!  Could I be blocked from my own site?
> I've been portscanning it a few times, moving it inside and outside the
> firewall.
> I don't have anything installed that would block an IP from using port
> 80.
> It's down now at 10:34 CDT, moving it outside the firewall didn't help.
> Sheeeeesh....what's going on?

Are you using nat? Could you be losing your dhcp lease and then renew it and 
get access to apache back. 

I have 2 NICs in crystal and http://crystal always works on the internal 
network. I don't do that very often because I have a router after the DSL 
modem and use the external address for even my internal accesses. Crystal's 
firewall does the nat translation for the 6 machines connected through it. 
Topaz (this machine) has its own IP and doesn't do nat. The firewall is also 
much tighter and anyone using the IP address is trying to break in. I log 
everything on this system.

It cost me more for 2 static IPs but that was a lot less trouble. You don't 
always have that choice.

Kent

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html



More information about the freebsd-questions mailing list