IP alias Networking Errors.

[Dirk-Willem van Gulik]

On Sat, 24 May 2003, Grant Peel wrote:

> fxp0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         inet 65.39.193.154 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 65.39.193.159
>         inet 65.39.193.155 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.39.193.155
>         inet 65.39.193.156 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.39.193.156
>         inet 65.39.193.157 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.39.193.157
>         inet 216.187.107.125 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.125
>         inet 216.187.107.126 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.126
>         inet 216.187.107.123 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.123
>         inet 216.187.107.124 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.124

Over here I have the same issue at my colo. The man page suggest a /32
netmask for all -but- the first on that subnet.SO I am using

>         inet 65.39.193.154 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 65.39.193.159
>         inet 65.39.193.155 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.39.193.155
>         inet 65.39.193.156 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.39.193.156
>         inet 65.39.193.157 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.39.193.157
>>        inet 216.187.107.125 netmask 0xfffffff0 broadcast 216.187.107.125
>         inet 216.187.107.126 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.126
>         inet 216.187.107.123 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.123
>         inet 216.187.107.124 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 216.187.107.124

Which got rid of my warnings.

Dw.