BIND 9
Jeremy Gaddis
jeremy at gaddis.org
Wed Jul 23 10:18:12 PDT 2003
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 23:33, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> At 2003-07-23T03:55:47Z, Tony Sterrett <tonyste at pacbell.net> writes:
>
> > I'm trying to configure both a master and slave DNS on the same
> > machine. My approach is to run the master by setting named_enable="YES"
> > and it will use the config file in /etc/named. To start the slave I will
> > In rc.local and it would use the config files in /etc/named/slave. Does
> > this seems ok? Is there a better way.
>
> This seems to come up every now and then. Before we start, is there any
> reason you want to have two seperate named process running, instead of
> having one process serving as master to some domains and slave to others?
No, it's generally considered {easier,better,more manageable,...} to
only have one instance of BIND. BIND can be master for some domains
and slave for others, so there really is no need.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <jeremy at gaddis.org> <http://www.gaddis.org>
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list