FreeBSD as router - performance vs hardware routers
kirk at strauser.com
Thu Aug 14 08:52:41 PDT 2003
At 2003-08-14T14:39:55Z, "J. Seth Henry" <jshamlet at comcast.net> writes:
> What I'm not sure about is performance. Has anyone built a cable modem
> gateway router using FreeBSD and "low-end" hardware like this? If so, what
> were your results?
Under full load, the (old) machine never uses more than 1 or 2% CPU -
including interrupt servicing. It moves along nicely.
The reason that I tend to prefer "soft" routers is that if you need extra
functionality, it's usually very easy to add it. A friend just replaced a
FreeBSD box with a Linksys SOHO router and was kind of peeved to realize
that he lost:
1) DHCP that's more than trivially configurable
2) The ability to send signed nameserver updates whenever his IP changes
4) Totally configurable NAT and firewalling
For most people, those probably aren't things that would be missed. I'd
hate to lose any of them.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/attachments/20030814/b33877cf/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-questions