emacs - gnu, x ...?
llewelly at lifesupport.shutdown.com
Fri Aug 1 10:07:29 PDT 2003
george donnelly <list at zettai.net> writes:
> [Benjamin Walkenhorst wrote (krylon at gmx.net) on 7/31/03 6:44 PM]
> > If you want a GUI, try GNU Emacs or XEmacs. I prefer GNU Emacs, but I suggest
> > you try both (if you are looking for a GUI).
> > If you don't want a GUI, and if you are not looking for Emacs' massive
> > extensibility, there are several curses-based "lookalikes" of Emacs, that
> > share Emacs' look and feel, but do not feature its lisp interpreter, and thus
> > much of its extensibility; on the other hand, they tend be more...
> > ressource-friendly than emacs. Among these smaller versions I know of zile
> > (zile is lossy emacs) and µemacs (micro emacs), though I have tried neither.
> thanks for the feedback. gui is not important, i guess i'm just looking for
> the neat features that everyone talks about - and with a minimum of resource
> usage as i would like to install it on a webserver as well so clients can
> use it over ssh.
What kind of bandwidth do your users have? e.g., right now I am using
emacs over ssh to a friends box, where the limiting bandwidth is
128kbits/s (that's the upstream dsl on the remote end.), and I
find it usable. However if your users will be comming in via
modem, IMO, modern emacs is no longer usable over modem (though
older emmacs were).
More information about the freebsd-questions