Time Problem in 5.0

[Lowell Gilbert]

Bill Moran <wmoran at potentialtech.com> writes:

> I'm going to repeat myself here:
> ntpdate is depreciated.  The functionality in it is duplicated by ntpd.
> It shouldn't even be in the 5.0 tree.  I'm considering filing a pr to
> request that it be removed.  Opinions?

In principle, I'd say that's fine, but I'm not enthusiastic about
making any changes in "contrib" packages unless it's really
necessary...