FreeBSD in General
V.M.Smith
vmsmith at grokking.org
Thu Apr 24 04:53:40 PDT 2003
Thanks for the lengthy (and largely hollow) diatribe. Well, at least you
thanked us for enduring it :)
On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 15:53, Gerald H. Kruchten wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
>
> First, a little about my background in UNIX and computers in
> general. Basically, I am highly qualified as pretty much of a complete
> idiot when it comes to Unix and not much better regarding the rest of the
> field. That pretty much covers my background. As for details, I am not
> computer illiterate, nor am I any where near to being an export on any
> operating system or computer. I get by. I presently run Windows NT 4.0 on
> one computer and Windows XP pro on the other. I make use of system
> commander as a boot loader on both computers because I have messed around
> with various different operating systems. At one point in time and when I
> only had one computer with a ton of hard drive space, I had the following
> operating systems loaded up and working on this computer at once: DOS 5.0,
> WindowsNT4.0, OS/2Warp 4, Mandrake's Linux 7.3, FreeBSD 4.2, and BeOS. Of
> all of them, I liked BeOS about the best and next after that was OS/2 as a
> close second choice because it was so fast. But one can no longer get the
> necessary drivers to get anything to operate correctly. I am not a
> programmer and I don't intend to be a programmer because it is too late in
> my life to try to teach this old dog a new career. I was able to get BSD
> going as well as the Mandrake-Linux. Mandrake's manuals left a lot to be
> desired and the operating system often hung. I prefer GUI because I am not
> a geek; never was and don't care to become one. A person's memory is made
> to be used for more important things than to remember UNIX commands. The
> prospect of sitting in a nursing home in my late years endlessly repeating
> and reciting useless UNIX commands while sitting in a wheel chair in a
> catatonic state sends shivers up and down my spine. That thought alone is
> repulsive. It is just that I am so frustrated with Microsoft's mode and
> method doing of business. I would probably feel different about it if I
> felt that they had the most reliable and efficient product, but we all know
> that this isn't so. They do have the easiest operating systems to
> use. Though I am not a programmer, I am convinced that Microsoft is more
> concerned about snooping into my business than they are in providing the
> fastest and most efficient software product available. I am looking for an
> operating system that will smoke MS in efficiency and productivity without
> being required to have a PHD, Master's or any other college degree to
> operate a computer system. BeOS and OS/2 Warp came closest to meeting my
> desired requirements, but neither of them are any longer being worked on or
> written for. Both OSes were truly fast and were multitasking.
>
> These days, Linux and FreeBSD seem to come closest to meet what I would
> like see in a computer operating system. But the three main vendors of
> Linux software, Red Hat, Mandrake, and SuSE all seem to be trying to follow
> the Microsoft business model of marketing. In the process, all of them,
> especially Mandrake, seem to be putting out crap versions just so one
> vendor can claim one-upsmanship over his competitor in having the latest
> version on the market. While this is transpiring, MS still having all the
> morals of a serial rapist, is working on its next big screw job. Most
> likely, a lot of us will be sucked in again. The only people of this
> industry that I'm not hearing a lot about is FreeBSD. I haven't seen a
> FreeBSD stable pack box at Comp USA in months, though they are still listed
> on your site as being a retailer.
>
> If your going to continue having them as a retailer, rather than putting
> out a FreeBSD v4.8 in a box, I think that you ought to get crackin' and get
> a relatively bugless or debugged version of 5.0 out there. The other thing
> that I am looking for is a GUI windows emulator that will operate "ALL"
> windows applications. I request that because I am presently forced to use
> a charting system that is programmed and designed only for the later
> versions of Windows. This is because companies that offer this kind of
> specialized software are usually very small and simply can't afford the
> capital costs that go with developing applications for multiple
> platforms. They develop applications for Windows because most of the
> businesses in the stock market industry still use MS operating
> software. It ends up being a vicious circle that leaves you guys, Linux
> and me out in the cold. I do like the simplicity with which one can
> usually operate a Microsoft OS. It's designed with the simpleton in
> mind. That's me. However, I personally also like some of the (I think
> the term used is platforms) GUI platforms that Linux uses, especially the
> use of multiple open windows. I never got far enough with my 4.2 BSD
> version to put any type of windows on it. I want to also say this about
> Linux. There is just something about the way that the Linux vendors are
> operating that goes against my grain. For pretty much that reason alone, I
> don't like them. Maybe it's like Microsoft and dejavu all over again. I
> can not say the same though for some of the people that use it. They say,
> "It rocks and that Linux has much better support than BSD." I can't say
> "yea" or "nay" to either claim. I just think and feel that you guys are
> probably the last good hope of having a "One size fits all, super speedy,
> super reliable operating system. I know that BSD is used under MAC X
> OS. But some questions: #1, Who can afford to buy a Mac computer at the
> prices that they want for them? #2; I know that Mac is used quite
> extensively in publishing businesses, but do you think that MAC is going to
> continue or be able to remain in business? I seriously doubt it because
> they can't seem to get past proprietary issues. That's the mode of
> thinking that got them into trouble in the first place. How many years has
> that been the case and how far have they moved off of dead center to
> resolve that issue? What I perceive as an answer to that question is, "Not
> very far." So, unless something really Earth shattering and great suddenly
> begins to happen, you are left as the last hope for the average Joe hope to
> obtain a simple, fast, and dynamite operating system that works with
> virtually every application ever made.
>
> I would suspect that by now, it is quite obvious from what I have written
> that I have little or no clue as to what is required when it comes to
> writing a software program and/or application. But I shouldn't need to
> have one. All that I, the everyday customer, should have to tell you is
> what I want. Once having done so, most any engineer/technician worth
> his/her salt, will readily be able to figure something out design it
> according to those specs. I just hope that it happens before I'm returned
> to ashes. I would like to be able to use and enjoy a universal operating
> system that will be able to handle anything that I load onto it and that I
> won't have to ready manuals for the next ten years just to power up and
> sign on. I don't think that I am wishing for too much here. After
> all, when one people of the industry told other people at seminars just a
> few years ago that the average household would have a computer and many of
> them two or more, the majority of people scoffed at that idea. I say, "Go
> for all the marbles." But don't go so slow that we can sit here and watch
> the snails race by or watch the paint peel. Thankyou for your time.
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Gerald Kruchten
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-questions at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-questions
mailing list