Current problem reports assigned to you

[Ceri Davies]

On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 05:59:37PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> 
> On 22-Dec-2003 Ceri Davies wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:09:06PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> >> On 2003.12.22 16:46:32 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> > 
> >> > On 22-Dec-2003 Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> >> > > On 2003.12.22 14:36:31 -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> > > 
> >> > >> Why does qa get two e-mails with two different lists?
> >> > > 
> >> > > I think it's because some PR's are assigned to 'qa' and others to
> >> > > 'freebsd-qa'.
> >> > 
> >> > Oof.  They all list 'qa' as the owner though.
> >> 
> >> The freebsd- part is stripped from the owner column, but the To field of
> >> the emails still have the real owner address.
> >> 
> >> All the PR's assigned to qa should probably be reassigned to freebsd-qa,
> >> since that seems to be the common form used other places...
> > 
> > Trivially done, but it will result in 126 mails to the list unless I
> > lock gnats for a few minutes to do it manually and regenerate the index.
> > 
> > Preferences?
> 
> Whatever is easiest for you.  Also, send a note to developers@ perhaps
> stating that freebsd-foo is preferred to foo.

I suspect it would be easier to handle this in the script that sends the
reports in the long term (short of having a list of valid Responsible
values).

Doing this the manual way to spare the list from spam turned out to be
problematic, so if this isn't a cause of major grief then I'll leave the
PRs as they were for now and renew my efforts to hunt down the scripts
concerned.

Ceri
-- 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-qa/attachments/20031222/edede415/attachment.bin