incorrect dependency registration?

[Dmitry Sivachenko]

On 29 сент. 2014 г., at 12:01, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt at FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 11:52:50AM +0400, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote:
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I am using FreeBSD-10/stable and pkg-1.3.8.
>> 
>> Consider py-dateutil port, it depends on py-six.
>> 
>> First, I installed py33-dateutil (with py33-six), for python3.
>> 
>> Now I install py-dateutil for python2.  Upon installation, I get the following waring:
>> ===>  Installing for py27-dateutil-2.2
>> ===>   py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on package: py27-six>0 - found
>> ===>   py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on package: py27-setuptools27>0 - found
>> ===>   py27-dateutil-2.2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.7 - found
>> ===>  Checking if py27-dateutil already installed
>> ===>   Registering installation for py27-dateutil-2.2
>> pkg-static: py27-dateutil-2.2: duplicate dependency listing: py33-six-1.5.2, ignoring
>> 
>> When I try to deinstall py27-six, I get:
>> 
>> # pkg delete py27-six
>> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
>> Deinstallation has been requested for the following 3 packages (of 0 packages in the universe):
>> 
>> Installed packages to be REMOVED:
>>        py27-six-1.8.0
>>        py33-dateutil-2.1_3 (depends on py27-six-1.8.0)
>>        py27-dateutil-2.2 (depends on py27-six-1.8.0)
>> 
>> The operation will free 1 MB.
>> 
>> Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]: 
>> 
>> (it wants to deinstall both versions of py-dateutil).
>> 
>> Something looks broken here.
>> 
>> Some time ago it did not let to install the same port for different python version, now it is possible but deps registration looks broken.
> 
> I do not have time for this right now, I'll see in a couple of days, but CCing
> parties that should be interested :)
> 


Can you reproduce this or is this a problem on my side?

Thanks.