Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS
Li-Wen Hsu
lwhsu at FreeBSD.org
Sun Jul 12 09:22:15 UTC 2009
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 22:55, Erwin Lansing<erwin at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:48:41AM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 21:32, Erwin Lansing<erwin at freebsd.org> wrote:
>> > LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER
>> > ==========================================================================
>> > py25-bsddb databases/py-bsddb perky at FreeBSD.org
>> > py25-bsddb databases/py25-bsddb python at FreeBSD.org
>>
>> I think these two are not an issue. Default Python version is switched to 2.6.
>>
>> But how this report generated? Switching happened before
>> databases/py25-bsddb repocpoied.
>>
> The script is in Tools/scripts/check-latest-link. Could this be caused
> by the installed python version on the system it runs on?
Sounds possible, and that's what bsd.python.mk does.
databases/py25-bsddb is a slave port of databases/py-bsddb,
which generates python 2.5 package for some ports depend on
specified python version. When a system with python 2.5
as the default setting, databases/py-bsddb and databases/py25-bsddb
should generate same package. So now the problem is, is it OK for them
have same LATEST_LINK? Or we can just ignore this problem, since this
should not effect official package build, and the latest links on the ftp.
--
Li-Wen Hsu
http://lwhsu.org
More information about the freebsd-python
mailing list