[Bug 220714] devel/boost-all: Update to 1.65 (currently beta)

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220714

Mark Millard <markmi at dsl-only.net> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |markmi at dsl-only.net

--- Comment #6 from Mark Millard <markmi at dsl-only.net> ---
(In reply to Jan Beich from comment #4)

What variations are desired to be covered?:

A) a system gcc 4.2.1 based build?
B) some modern lang/gcc* based build(s)?
C) a devel/llvm40 based build?
D) an experimental system-clang-4 based build?

Which of these even involve libcxxrt use
in the code produced and which do not?
Is libcxxrt common to all of the options?

Note: (C) and (D) might be a problem for
running the built code because clang targeting
either 32-bit or 64-bit powerpc does not yet
produce code that handles thrown C++
exceptions in a FreeBSD context: a program
crash results (last I knew).

Also:

*) Variations that experiment with lib32 code
   under 64-bit FreeBSD?

@) 32-bit FreeBSD vs. 64-bit FreeBSD?

There are a lot of combinations overall.


(Note: It may be days before I can get to
such experiments and at the time I'll likely
only have access to one PowerPC machine,
a so-called "Quad-core" PowerMac G5 [2 dual
core processors]. It can run 32-bit FreeBSD
as well though.)


I'm guessing that Justin H. is testing (A)
for 64-bit code on 64-bit powerpc64 FreeBSD.
Off the top of my head I do not know if that
involves libcxxrt for the produced code or
not.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.