freebsd-ports Digest, Vol 930, Issue 4
Adriaan de Groot
adridg at freebsd.org
Thu Mar 25 14:43:22 UTC 2021
On Thursday, 25 March 2021 13:00:02 CET freebsd-ports-request at freebsd.org
wrote:
> The idea is to try to have www/qt5-webengine fixed before the expiration
> time, saving with it a bunch of innocent ports depending on it, correct?
In the sense of "have one guy take a stab at it over the weekend because
multi-billion-dollar companies can't be arsed", yes. I'm not sure what the
situation over in Linux-land is.
[ade]
PS1. I'm going to primarily blame Google; the Qt Company, though, is far from
blameless in its maintainence of WebEngine (or lack thereof). I have hope for
TurtleBrowser, but they are also kind of waiting on me for a breakthrough on
the Python3 front.
PS2. Works-in-progress are the branches *webengine-python3* (old, but does
complete an entire build that then doesn't actually **work**) and *webengine-
logpy27* (new, currently more hacky, doesn't build) in the https://github.com/
freebsd/freebsd-ports-kde.git ports repo.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 659 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20210325/d850dd5f/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list