www/joomla3 is no longer in the FreeBSD pkg repo
Chris Rees
crees at bayofrum.net
Thu Mar 4 09:48:12 UTC 2021
Hi Patrick,
On 04/03/2021 08:50, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>> Am 04.03.2021 um 02:17 schrieb Chris Rees <crees at bayofrum.net>:
>> The problem is, that although the php80 flavour does not depend on pecl-pdflib, the default flavour does,
>> which means that the package will not be built as it you have to agree to pecl-pdflib's licence.
> I am not a lawyer. That being said I have done some homework and did a lot if reading
> in February 2020. Sent my findings to the port maintainer of print/pdflib, but did not get
> a response, unfortunately.
>
> My conclusion is that you don't need to agree to PDFlib GmbH's license, because all
> of the legalese on their home page applies to a completely different product than the
> one used by pecl-pdflib.
>
> But step by step ...
>
> 1. pecl-pdflib is published under the PHP license, so it is clearly open source.
> 2. The FreeBSD port is not based on pdflib, but pdflib-lite - this is the crucial point.
> 3. pdflib-lite is a product abandoned by PDFlib GmbH in 2011.
> 4. pdflib-lite archives come with an open source license bundled in the archive.
> 5. This is the only license applicable to our case. All the other licensing stuff on their
> website applies to pdflib - *which is a completely different product*.
> 6. The license bundled with pdflib-lite explicitly permits the distribution of binaries as
> long as the license document and some other auxiliary files are included.
> 7. The port does this and puts the necessary documents in /usr/local/share/doc/pdflib.
>
> You won't find any information about pdflib-lite on PDFlib GmbH's website, because
> they pulled it. Nonetheless the source is "out there", bundled with a permissive license
> which cannot be taken back.
>
> So the entire discussion is moot - as long as pecl-pdflib can be built with pdflib-lite.
>
> The problem with the port/packages infrastructure is that this line in ports/print/pdflib/Makefile
> is nonsense, IMHO:
>
> RESTRICTED= Many odd restrictions on usage and distribution
>
>
> Download the pdflib-lite tarball and see the documents for yourself. I am repeating myself:
> all the legalese on the PDFlib GmbH website *does not apply* to this product (pdflib-lite).
I'm afraid that this, which I found in pdflib-lite's readme.txt [1]
differs on that opinion.
----
- PDFlib Lite
Open-source edition for basic PDF generation, free for personal use.
PDFlib Lite does not support all languages, and is not available on
EBCDIC platforms.
----
"Free for personal use" is not Free, and that's why the licence must be
acknowledged.
Unless you have found explicit mention that it is definitely under the
PHP licence?
Chris
[1] https://github.com/Distrotech/PDFlib-Lite
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list