Suggestion: USES=autoplist
Yuri
yuri at freebsd.org
Thu Nov 23 08:51:58 UTC 2017
On 11/22/17 08:59, Brooks Davis wrote:
> Looking to the future, is the port an obviously candidate for FLAVORS or
> multi-packages? If so, they you probably want to keep the current
> plist. If not, then I guess it depends on your confidence that the port
> will remain well behaved.
Flavors and multi-packages will work fine with autoplist. autoplist
always generates the plist according to the currently selected options.
Well-behavedness is what is really required for autoplist.
Yuri
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list