bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both)

[Tijl Coosemans]

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 +0000 (UTC) jbeich at freebsd.org (Jan Beich) wrote:
> Tijl Coosemans <tijl at FreeBSD.org> writes:
>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer.com> wrote:
>>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on
>>> bsd.sites.mk recently.
>>> 
>>> One question I ran into:  If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, 
>>> which of the two do we prefer?  (Or do we want to list both?)  
>>
>> https first for people that run 'make makesum'.  
> 
> It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago.
> 
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051

Ugh, can portmgr approve the attached patch?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: fetchenv.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 424 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20170311/eb791981/attachment.bin>