[RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version
madpilot at FreeBSD.org
Mon Jun 26 07:30:55 UTC 2017
On 06/26/17 09:27, Guido Falsi wrote:
> I'd say the difficult part in such a problem is not in the idea but in
> the boring details of it's implementation and long term maintenance.
I forgot one important piece of information:
Any project that requires full dedication from all committers to a
"stable/release ports branch" is bound to be criticized to death and
anyway bound to failure (IMHO). Any such proposal should identify some
volunteer party with well defined roles. Remember ports work is all
volunteer, you can't impose any work on any party!
Guido Falsi <madpilot at FreeBSD.org>
More information about the freebsd-ports