mail/alpine new Makefile
mbeis at xs4all.nl
Fri Jun 9 11:26:52 UTC 2017
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017, the wise Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> On 6/9/17 7:41 PM, Marco Beishuizen wrote:
> Hi Marco,
> I believe the reason is:
>> .include <bsd.port.options.mk>
> The port includes this ^^^^ ... AND
>> .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
> This ---------^^^^^
> Use one or the other, or neither if its *all* options helpers, but not
> both. See:
> The paragraph just above the "Example 5.28. Simple Use of OPTIONS"
Thanks Kubilay. I've removed the ".include <bsd.port.pre.mk" line and
changed the ".include <bsd.port.post.mk>" line at the end to ".include
<bsd.port.mk>". It still builds and installs but the options that are
set are still not built in.
Also the file /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.options.mk suggests that all three
lines should be present.
Science is true. Don't be misled by facts.
More information about the freebsd-ports