Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!
Steve Wills
swills at FreeBSD.org
Thu Feb 9 15:47:16 UTC 2017
Hi,
On 02/09/2017 10:30, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
>> On 9 Feb 2017, at 4:09 PM, Steve Wills <swills at freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> Ports and packages are maintained on the assumption that the user is
>> using a supported version of the OS. We didn't decide when to end
>> support for 10.1 or 10.2. How long after the end of life for 10.1 would
>> you have ports maintain support?
>
> The issue is quite simple and cause of multiple issues:
>
> FreeBSD package management makes an ABI promise in the form of
> "FreeBSD:10:amd64", but not even pkg code itself adheres to this,
> and thus we have had subtle and yet fatal breakage in 10.2 and 10.3.
>
> And since pkg acts according to the imposed paradigm of a unified
> ABI, this will continue to be a source of problems for users who
> cannot know what's going on, lest even know how to fix it.
>
> They simply run:
>
> # pkg upgrade
>
> And then their systems are unusable *and* not fixable with pkg.
>
> What are they supposed to do? They come here. They want to make
> everyone aware that this is a serious issue that shouldn't repeat
> in FreeBSD 11. It's not to late to do that by pinning the pkg ABI
> to 11.0 by forcing the proper feature macros.
They're supposed to upgrade to a supported version of FreeBSD.
Steve
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 642 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20170209/02675f3a/attachment.sig>
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list