"Confused" PORTREVISION
Kevin Oberman
rkoberman at gmail.com
Mon Dec 25 05:23:15 UTC 2017
On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 9:18 PM, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote:
> On 24 Dec, 2017, at 20:03, Walter Schwarzenfeld <w.schwarzenfeld at utanet.at>
>> wrote:
>>
>> But
>>
>> RUBY_RELVERSION= 2.3.6
>> RUBY_PORTREVISION= 0 <=
>> RUBY_PORTEPOCH= 1
>> RUBY_PATCHLEVEL= 0
>> RUBY23= "" # PLIST_SUB helpers
>>
>> PORTREVISION=0 confuses pkg version
>>
>> pkg version |grep ruby23
>> ruby23-2.3.6,1 <
>>
>> this is the version which is installed.
>>
>
> PORTREVISION=0 is treated as if it were unset. Some people prefer using
> that construct because it keeps line numbers consistent in the SVN history.
>
> # Adam
The Porters Handbook now calls for the use of portrevision=0.
--
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list