Procmail Vulnerabilities check

Carmel NY carmel_ny at outlook.com
Sun Dec 10 21:41:05 UTC 2017


On Sunday, December 10, 2017 4:18 PM, RW wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 10:10:30 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Strongly agree! Support ofr some basics like .forward is really a
> > requirement. It is used for too many "normal" mail operations
> > including private dropmail or procmail setups as well as forwarding to
> > a smartmail system.
> 
> This is actually an argument for taking sendmail out of the base system.
> If you need to install dropmail or procmail as a package you might just as well
> install an MTA in the same way.

IMHO, I think that "postfix" should be the base MTA. It is far easier to configure, it is rock solid
and the Postfix forum and documentation are superb. Plus, Dovecot integrates with it seamlessly.

-- 
Carmel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20171210/dcd24af9/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list