Procmail Vulnerabilities check

Chris H bsd-lists at BSDforge.com
Sat Dec 9 05:40:54 UTC 2017


On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 15:12:12 +1100 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" <dave at horsfall.org> said

> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote:
> 
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2017-December/018712.html
> 
> Well, I saw no reason to subscribe to freebsd-arch (I'm on enough lists as 
> it is)...  Are there any other lists that we should be following?
> 
> I guess a suit and tie will be required soon :-(
> 
> I'm bemused by Bapt's remark that "it does not support anything an 
> entreprised [sic] grade mta setup would require: ldap support for 
> example"; funny, as I had it working just fine with OpenLDAP with hundreds 
> of users spread over many offices in my last job, with no trouble at all; 
> there's even a schema for it, FFS:
> 
>     aneurin% locate -i sendmail.schema
>     /usr/share/sendmail/cf/sendmail.schema
> 
> with all the right gear in it:
> 
>     # OID arcs for Sendmail
>     # enterprise:           1.3.6.1.4.1
>     # sendmail:             enterprise.6152
> 
> WTF?  Sure as hell looks like Sendmail supports LDAP to me...

Agreed!
OK I don't have a copy of HEAD handy to search. But a look at the web
copy of the svn repo shows it's still there. The logs show no impending
doom. So I'd like to respectfully request that Sendmail stays.
All those in favor, say aye!

--Chris
P.S. Please try to keep it civil. :-)
> 
> -- 
> Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU)  "Those who don't understand security will
> suffer."
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"




More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list