Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless)

blubee blubeeme gurenchan at gmail.com
Thu Dec 7 13:34:35 UTC 2017


>From my experience poudriere doesn't support that workflow.

Either build the port and create a package of it, then install that on your
target machine
or
build everything in your laptop. Poudriere wants to be the build bot.

On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Matthias Apitz <guru at unixarea.de> wrote:

> El día jueves, diciembre 07, 2017 a las 01:40:28p. m. +0100, Jan Beich
> escribió:
>
> > Fernando Apesteguía <fernando.apesteguia at gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > > Can poudriere prefetch packages too?
> >
> > No until https://github.com/freebsd/poudriere/issues/319 is fixed.
>
> I have a question which points in some similar direction: I have built
> my ports with poudriere, which results in some 2000 packages. I copy over
> this repos to my other laptops and netbooks for installation. In
> addition I have on the target laptops the exact same SVN revision of
> /usr/ports as in the poudriere jail where the packages have been built.
> All fine until here.
>
> Sometimes I want to add some port which was not built with poudriere
> directly compiling it on the target laptops and now, ofc, this
> compilation is missing some other packages the concrete port is
> depending on and it tries to build them too, even if they are already as
> built package in my local repo. If I'm not lazy, I watch the building
> and when it goes to look in Internet for some additional source to
> build, I interrupt the 'make install' and look if I could install it from
> the local repo. Boring. Can I direct the make process to look on the
> flight into the local repo to satisfy the needs of the compilation of
> the port?
>
>         matthias
> --
> Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru at unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/  📱
> +49-176-38902045
> Public GnuPG key: http://www.unixarea.de/key.pub
>


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list