standard locations for port files
Jonathan Chen
jonc at chen.org.nz
Thu Aug 31 20:20:53 UTC 2017
On 1 September 2017 at 07:54, <scratch65535 at att.net> wrote:
> [Default] On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 13:53:27 -0500, Adam Vande More
> <amvandemore at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:41 PM, <scratch65535 at att.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that all
>>> other port "stuff" is under /usr/local, what advantage is there
>>> in making logs an exception?
>>>
>>
>>Because logs shouldn't be under /usr.
>
> Why not? The current location wasn't determined by natural law,
> it was just someone's decision, almost certainly made without
> much thought at all. It could be re-decided just as easily.
That particular decision was made decades ago that logs are expected
to live in /var/log; and re-deciding that decision would break
predictably on all BSD based systems.
Cheers.
--
Jonathan Chen <jonc at chen.org.nz>
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list