mariadb10* ports broken on 9.x since last commit

[Konstantin Belousov]

On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:50:18PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> I don't know.  I understood from Kostik that it would need r232832, but
> apparently this breaks the ABI?
Yes, kind of.  I considered it not appropriate to change the interaction
between csu and rtld for long-lived stable branch.  Also, it might cause
problems for other language translators which provide their own runtimes.

That were the reasonings several years ago, when initializers were reworked,
and definitely I do not want to disturb the branch near EOL.
> 
> It is probably easier to work around this by configuring the binutils
> port so it does not emit .init_array/.fini_array sections.
It was already done in ports r421193.

> 
> -Dimitry
> 
> [1] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=232832
>