lighttpd does not pull OpenSSL dependency

Mathieu Arnold mat at
Thu Oct 27 18:40:21 UTC 2016

Le 27/10/2016 à 20:36, Matthew D. Fuller a écrit :
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 06:35:25PM +0200 I heard the voice of
> Mathieu Arnold, and lo! it spake thus:
>> Well, that is another problem, and you are right, OpenSSL's shlib
>> should have been bumped, blame the former maintainer for that. I'll
>> talk to the new maintainer about that.
> The argument could be made that (a) OpenSSL 1.1.0 is gonna be released
> and brought into ports Any Day Now and it already has a different
> shlibver (and that would get us back on parity with upstream, for what
> that's worth), and (b) by the time 11-CURRENT (where you gotta expect
> bumps) becomes 11-STABLE, base openssl will be private-ized anyway.
> It's a good couple theories...

Yes, well, OpenSSL 1.1.0 was released, in late august, it was committed
without any kind of test, and broke many things, which is why I reverted it.
So, yes, it could come along any day, but the shlib number is just an
artificial number, it should have been bumped months ago, and it still
has not.

Mathieu Arnold

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list