dreamx at gmx.de
Mon Oct 24 05:34:41 UTC 2016
On 24/10/2016 03:22, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> scratch65535 at att.net wrote:
>> For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially
>> deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up
>> that there's potentially something unsavory about it.
> Snap ! Seconded :-)
> Same as my Mon, 24 Oct 2016 01:05:52 +0200
> but datestamps show you thought of it first :-)
> Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich
> Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable.
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
Maybe off-topic, but I can't help wondering if we're close to the point
when a port should be removed because someone finds a variable/type name
Am I being paranoid? Let's wait and see.
More information about the freebsd-ports