Julian H. Stacey
jhs at berklix.com
Sun Oct 23 23:06:20 UTC 2016
Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 01:31:04PM +0200, Alphons van Werven wrote:
> > I'm still half waiting for someone with misguided delusions of moral
> > superiority to delete that port, thinking it's their decision to make
> > that FreeBSD must not enable people to display their system load as a
> > cartoon woman in various stages of undress.
> It's not delusions of moral superiority. It's common decency.
"Common decency" is disputable even in within USA; Europe is less
infested with USA style prissy "political correctness", & other
places less than Europe. Censorship of Global FreeBSD to USA norms
> There's no "censorship" if the FreeBSD developers make a collective
> decision that they don't want to be associated with juvenile junk
Some will consider games/* & misc/jive etc juvenile, & other ports offensive
for licence or many other reasons. Tolerate them all, Live & let live.
The vast majority of commiters are innocent. Just a few ports butchers
have degraded FreeBSD, removing working ports in last few years.
Rather than delete or move sensitive ports to a new SUBDIR, causing
disruption, & SVN work, Add a flag to bsd.port.mk
like NO_CDROM eg SENSITIVE= (like a TV / Cinema adults only flag).
> that makes them look like a bunch of out-of-touch clueless old white
Inflamatory language degrades, Mature language builds.
Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich
Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable.
More information about the freebsd-ports