harder and harder to avoid pkg
loic.blot at unix-experience.fr
Fri Oct 14 06:22:43 UTC 2016
FreeBSD ports are complicated ?
Does someone of you tryed to do a Debian package, it's even more
complicated as you should modify many path, split package in multiple
packages, do the service engineering with systemV or systemD, etc ?
UNIX systems, security and network engineer
Le jeudi 13 octobre 2016 à 18:08 +0200, Miroslav Lachman a écrit :
> David Demelier wrote on 2016/10/13 14:42:
> > 2016-10-12 10:04 GMT+02:00 Andrea Venturoli <ml at netfence.it>:
> > > On 10/12/16 09:24, Matthieu Volat wrote:
> > >
> > > > And GNU/Linuxes can be a PITA when you have to track -dev(el)
> > > > packages
> > > > (which sometimes really requires -bin, -app or whatever), or
> > > > worst, describe
> > > > to people how they are supposed to build your software with
> > > > weird subpackage
> > > > names.
> > > >
> > > > I really like that ports provides the software project as
> > > > intended by
> > > > upstream (modulo options).
> > >
> > >
> > > Just a "me too" here!
> > Could not agree more.
> > Please forget that idea.
> > I just hate having to install libfoo, libfoo-dev, libfoo-dbg,
> > libfoo-doc, libfoo-whatever each time I need to develop on Linux.
> > Please do not transform FreeBSD as a Linux distribution :)
> > I love the way FreeBSD and some very sparse Linux distributions
> > provide the packages exactly how it would be installed by hand (=
> > vanilla).
> > FreeBSD offers some options and very few changes for better
> > integration but packages are provided vanilla. You want a package?
> > You
> > install /packagename/ nothing more, nothing less. I really would
> > like
> > to see simple vanilla packages for the next 10 years.
> > The FreeBSD ports is already extremely complicated, do not make it
> > even harder :(
> +1 for this!
> Miroslav Lachman
> freebsd-ports at freebsd.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe at freebsd.o
More information about the freebsd-ports