Alternatives to rsync
Matthias Andree
matthias.andree at gmx.de
Thu Oct 13 08:40:44 UTC 2016
Am 13.10.2016 um 07:20 schrieb Peter Beckman:
> 2. Why is GPL3 out of the question? Is the user going to resell the
> device
> as a service? If the user is simply "using" the software, no
> disclosure
> of other software is necessary. Only if your user is attempting to
> "make
> money" from the sale of the software or service powered by rsync does
> the source need to be disclosed.
What does the GPLv3 have to do with reselling software as a service?
The _Affero_ GPL variants are what copyleft software-as-a-service, not
the plain GPLv3 itself.
More information about the freebsd-ports
mailing list