rkoberman at gmail.com
Mon Mar 21 21:30:26 UTC 2016
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Carmel <carmel_ny at outlook.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:42:54 +0100, Kurt Jaeger stated:
> >> >The make check of clamav exposes some issues, I've reported them
> >> >upstream:
> >> >
> >> >https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11542
> >> For whatever reason, I keep getting this error message when I try an
> >> access that report:
> >> You are not authorized to access bug #11542.
> >Yes. It seems clamav bugzilla is restrictive and I can not change
> >that, as submitter of that bug.
> Now that makes about "ZERO" sense. Why would you (meaning clamav) want
> to hide bug information? Dumbest thing I ever saw (almost).
Hmm. Let's see. A bug that may allow the defeat of a security mechanism and
allow a black-hat to do bad stuff before the bug con even be looked at. Why
would anyone have an issue with that? I mean, don't we all want more
zero-day vulnerabilities? (Sorry, Guess I put on my sarcasm hat today.)
Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer
E-mail: rkoberman at gmail.com
PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683
More information about the freebsd-ports