iozone3-434 fails to rebuild

[Kimmo Paasiala]

On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Doug Sampson <dougs at dawnsign.com> wrote:
> Trying to rebuild iozone after a recent port upgrade and it crashes as follows:
>
>   ###
> <...snip...>
> iozone.c:1297:1: error: unknown type name 'off64_t'; did you mean 'off_t'?
> off64_t offset = 0;               /*offset for random I/O */
> ^~~~~~~
> off_t
> /usr/include/sys/types.h:173:18: note: 'off_t' declared here
> typedef __off_t         off_t;          /* file offset */
>                         ^
> iozone.c:1298:1: error: unknown type name 'off64_t'; did you mean 'off_t'?
> off64_t offset64 = 0;               /*offset for random I/O */
> ^~~~~~~
> off_t
> /usr/include/sys/types.h:173:18: note: 'off_t' declared here
> typedef __off_t         off_t;          /* file offset */
>                         ^
> iozone.c:1299:1: error: unknown type name 'off64_t'; did you mean 'off_t'?
> off64_t filebytes64;
> ^~~~~~~
> off_t
> /usr/include/sys/types.h:173:18: note: 'off_t' declared here
> typedef __off_t         off_t;          /* file offset */
>                         ^
> fatal error: too many errors emitted, stopping now [-ferror-limit=]
> 2 warnings and 20 errors generated.
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop.
> make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/benchmarks/iozone/work/iozone3_434/src/current
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop.
> make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/benchmarks/iozone
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop.
> make: stopped in /usr/ports/benchmarks/iozone
> root at pisces:/usr/ports/benchmarks/iozone#
>    ###
>
> root at pisces:/usr/ports/benchmarks/iozone# make showconfig
> ===> The following configuration options are available for iozone-3.434:
>      SSH=on: Use ssh in distributed measurement
>      THREADS=on: Enable threading (uses pthreads)
> ===> Use 'make config' to modify these settings
> root at pisces:/usr/ports/benchmarks/iozone#
>
> Doesn't matter which config options I select/deselect, it still fails to rebuild. It occurs on both 10.3-RELEASE-p4 i386 and 10.3-RELEASE-p4 amd64 systems.
>
>
> ~Doug
> _______________________________________________

Same here on 10.3-RELEASE. I wonder how the port got updated with
sponsorship from "Gandi.net", yet the committed changes were
apparently not tested? Shouldn't Gandi.net volunteer as the maintainer
for the port if they want it to be updated (the port is unmaintained
at the moment)?

-Kimmo