what to do when base openssl isn't suitable
franco at lastsummer.de
Fri Jul 1 19:56:22 UTC 2016
> On 01.07.2016, at 20:59, Don Lewis <truckman at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> I've got a port that does not work with base openssl because it looks
> for libssl.pc. Other than that, I don't think it is picky about what
> flavor of ports ssl is installed. Because the default version of ssl
> still defaults to base, I don't see a way to get this port to build on
> the cluster, so there is no way to provide binary packages. That's a
> problem for end users because this port has bunch of huge build
> dependencies. Thoughts?
Take a look at security/letskencrypt which pins its SSL to LibreSSL from ports, because it won't build with OpenSSL at all. Really nifty reworks happened recently with USES in that regard.
More information about the freebsd-ports