FreeBSD Port: samba44-4.4.8

[Timur I. Bakeyev]

On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 9:32 PM, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org> wrote:

> > On 29 Dec, 2016, at 13:24, Timur I. Bakeyev <timur at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Adam Weinberger <adamw at adamw.org>
> wrote:
> >> > On 28 Dec, 2016, at 7:51, Timur I. Bakeyev <timur at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi, CVB!
> >> >
> >> > At the moment I can't connect to svn.freebsd.org on whatever
> reason... BTW,
> >> > anyone knows, what has changed in recent 12 hours?
> >> >
> >> > You can apply the following patch manually:
> >> >
> >> > With best regards,
> >> > BaT
> >>
> >> Timur,
> >>
> >> No packages for samba are being built because configure with the
> default option set fails. Samba can't depend on openldap-sasl if its
> databases/ldb dependency depends on openldap (without sasl).
> >>
> >> Either samba needs to depend on openldap without sasl, or ldb needs to
> depend on openldap-sasl.
> >>
> >> # Adam
> > Hi, Adam!
> >
> > I've seen the reports and think to upgrade ldb to work with ldap-sasl
> version instead. In general, handling of SASL in LDAP package isn't
> graceful, while libraries by themselves are interchangeable, pkg sees them
> as entirely different ones :(
>
> Agreed, it's really ugly. Does samba require SASL-enabled OpenLDAP? Keep
> in mind that if ldb and samba* require openldap-sasl, then every port that
> depends on either of them might require adding WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL too.
>

Luckily, there aren't many ports that directly depend on samba* or ldb*. I
believe most of the time samba is run dependency rather that build
dependency.

Regards,
Timur.

P.S> I really wonder, what was the problem with svn.freebsd.org(213.138.116.72)
yesterday, so I couldn't connect for half a day.