Deriving base port/package names
000.fbsd at quip.cz
Mon Apr 11 10:57:40 UTC 2016
Roger Marquis wrote on 04/08/2016 16:47:
> Some of us see this as a weakness in the standard. That plus the lack
> of documentation where you'd expect to find it violates the principles
> of least surprise and KIS.
There is one more place where naming is really strange - rc scripts.
These scripts have usually the same filename as PROVIDE value and
name="" value. But there is ugly exception in /etc/rc.d/bgfsck:
It causes problems with eval in rc.subr. I already tried to discuss it 6
years ago but it seems nobody cares.
Note - in the original message the second example is from rc.d/sshd not
More information about the freebsd-ports