Ports requires pkg 1.6.0, but 1.5.6 is the latest available

[Matthew Seaman]

On 29/09/2015 21:34, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> The ports system was changed to make mandatory a version of pkg that was
> not available by the default method.  That's a POLA violation, but it
> appears no one wants to talk about it.

To turn that around, why are you mixing pkgs from a quarterly branch
with ports compiled from head?  If you use ports/pkgs from a consistent
source then you won't suffer from this problem.

	Matthew


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 957 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20150929/b11d17ba/attachment.bin>