package version scheme
delphij at delphij.net
Tue Sep 1 21:24:09 UTC 2015
On 09/01/15 14:16, Xin Li wrote:
> On 09/01/15 14:11, Larry Rosenman wrote:
>> On 2015-09-01 16:08, Xin Li wrote:
>> I, as sysutils/lsof maintainer, depend on the behavior you see (the >).
>> Vic Abell uses the letters as "fixup" releases, until a full release,
>> for example;
>> 4.89A -> 4.89B -> 4.89C -> 4.89 -> 4.90A -> 4.90B -> 4.90
> Yes (note that this is not what I have seen, but what I expect and
> documented in the porters' handbook). For instance:
> $ pkg version -t 4.89A 4.89
> $ pkg version -t 4.89a 4.89
Sorry I misread your email. Yes, the behavior of DISTVERSION ->
PORTVERSION derivation was correct for lsof case, and the . in porters'
handbook is for this exact usage.
Xin LI <delphij at delphij.net> https://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the freebsd-ports